@Article{MachadoHaneTrevFont:2012:AnFoRe,
author = "Machado, Rita Margarete Donato and Haneda, Renata Natsumi and
Trevisan, Bruno Peruchi and Fontes, S{\'e}rgio Rodrigues",
affiliation = "{} and {} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Effect of enzymatic treatment on the cross-flow microfiltration of
a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp: Analysis of the fouling and recovery of
phytochemicals",
journal = "Journal of Food Engineering",
year = "2012",
volume = "113",
pages = "442--452",
keywords = "microfiltration, a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp, enzymatic treatment,
polyphenols, antioxidant capacity.",
abstract = "This study aimed to investigate the effects of pectinase enzyme
treatment of a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp on cross-flow
microfiltration (CFMF) performance and on phytochemical and
functional characteristics of their compounds. Analyses of fouling
mechanisms were carried out through resistance in series and
blocking in law models. The enzymatic treatment was conducted
using Ultrazym AFPL (Novozymes A/S) at 500 mg kg1 of
a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp for 30 min at 35 C. Before
microfiltrations, untreated and enzyme-treated
a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulps were previously diluted in distilled
water (1:3; w/v). CFMFs were conducted using commercial a-alumina
(a-Al2O3) ceramic membranes (Andritz AG, Austria) of 0.2 lm and
0.8 lm pore sizes, and 0.0047 m2 of filtration area. The
microfiltration unit was operated in batch mode for 120 min at 25
C and the fluid-dynamic conditions were transmembrane pressure of
DP = 100 kPa and cross-flow velocity of 3 m s1 in turbulent flow.
The highest values of permeate flux and accumulated permeate
volume were obtained using enzymetreated pulp and 0.2 lm pore size
membranes with steady flux values exceeding 100 L h1 m2. For the
0.8 lm pore size membrane, the estimated total resistance after
the microfiltration of enzyme-treated a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp
was 21% lower than the untreated pulp, and for the 0.2 lm pore
size membrane, it was 18%. Cake filtration was the dominant
mechanism in the early stages of most of the CFMF processes. After
approximately 20 min, however, intermediate pore blocking and
complete pore blocking contributed to the overall fouling
mechanisms. The reduction of the antioxidant capacity of the
permeates obtained after microfiltration of the enzyme-treated
pulp was higher (p < 0.01) than that obtained using untreated
pulp. For total polyphenols, on the contrary, the permeates
obtained after microfiltration of the enzyme-treated pulp showed a
lower mean reduction (p < 0.01) than those from the untreated
pulp. The results show that the enzymatic treatment had a positive
effect on the CFMF process of a{\c{c}}a{\'{\i}} pulp.",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.06.022",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.06.022",
issn = "0260-8774",
label = "lattes: 7753807121855274 4 MachadoFontHaneTrev:2012:AnFoRe",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "30 abr. 2024"
}